Long Term Investing

I am always fixated with swing trading because I do not have patience with most things in life. Whenever there is a 15% unrealised gain in a position, I will be very tempted to monetise the gain. I believe that I am in the category of “sell winners too fast, hold on to the losers”. To some extent, I truly believe that we live in a world that is filled with ‘black swans’. Hence, the bird in the hand theory matters. Swing trading provides wealth creation opportunities in the shortest possible time frame. On a serious note, one should seriously consider long term investing in order to balance out a portfolio that is filled by a combination of short-medium and long term trading / investment positions. It is usually the case that multi-baggers come from long term investing. To qualify for long term investing, one should truly look beyond an investment horizon of more than 2-3 years.

Continue reading “Long Term Investing”

Equity Rating Scorecard

My view on trading or investing is that it should always be discretionary to large extent. Trading or investing involves significant amount of judgement call. There should not always be one standardised single way of looking at a particular trade or investing idea.

Trading or investing should always be considered from a multi-aspect angle and shall be as dynamic as possible. In this posting, I am trying to develop an equity rating scorecard. The purpose of this scorecard is not to remove the discretion from trading or investing but to nicely link up factors of fundamental, technical, risk management and other critical factors.

It is about placing weightage on what matters when comes to investing or trading. In this scorecard, there is more weightage being anchored towards fundamentals, of which I believe that it is the fundamentals that will drive the long term value of a security. The proposed weightage is as follows: 60% on fundamentals, 30% on technical & risk management and 10% on other critical factors (e.g insider transations, analysts’ target price).

What does the final scoring mean?

This is entirely up to us and it is purely arbitrary. Strictly for illustration, I rank my scoring as follows (seriously, it is purely arbitrary):

4.5 – 5.0                Higher probability to be positive return

4.0 – 4.49              Expected to be positive return

3.5-3.99                Manageable Risk + Possibly Directionless / Breakeven

2.5-3.49                Higher probability of not positive return

<2.5                       Possibly high risk

 

Strictly for illustration – WTK Holdings

Slide1.PNG

Strictly for illustration – Comfort Gloves (from an earlier posting: see this )

Slide2.PNG

The effectiveness of the scorecard has not been assessed based on historical financial & market data. Nevertheless, it may be a good starting point in harmonising both Fundamental and Technical analysis. This Equity Rating Scorecard is a dynamic piece of document and shall be continuously refined over time.

Continue reading “Equity Rating Scorecard”

Digging Deeper

In one of the earlier posts (see this ), Malaysian-listed printing specialist, Tien Wah Press Holdings Berhad was one of the illustrative “buy signal” results extracted based on rules-based algorithmic screening process. Let’s dig deeper into this security. Continue reading “Digging Deeper”

Technical Screening (4 Jul 2017)

Based on the recently developed multi-indicators trading systems , the key indicators & buy signals are summarised as follows:

  • Price crossover above lower Keltner Channel (20,2.25) 
  • RSI(14) crosses above 30.0 
  • RSI(14) was below 30 for the last 5 days 

Based on the above stated technical rules, the following is the results of the stocks screening (as of 4 Jul 2017):

Screening 05072017.png

Continue reading “Technical Screening (4 Jul 2017)”

My Trading Principles



DISCLAIMER: THIS IS A PERSONAL BLOG AND SHALL NOT BE RELIED IN WHATSOEVER MANNER BY ANYONE. ALL ARTICLES CONTAINED IN THIS SITE ARE FOR INFORMATION AND ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ACTUAL RESULTS. IT IS NOT, AND SHOULD NOT BE REGARDED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE OR AS A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ANY PARTICULAR SECURITY OR COURSE OF ACTION. SOURCES USED IN THIS SITE HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED FOR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS AND TIMELINESS. YOU SHOULD SEEK INDEPENDENT AND PROFESSIONAL INVESTMENT ADVICE IN REGARD TO YOUR INVESTMENT DECISIONS. THE AUTHOR MAY HOLD POSITIONS IN THE SECURITIES MENTIONED IN THE ARTICLES

FBMKLCI vs Brent Crude (Updated)

News Update: 

Oil prices fell to almost four-month lows on Wednesday after data showed U.S. crude inventories rising faster than expected, piling pressure on OPEC to extend output cuts beyond June.

The American Petroleum Institute said late Tuesday that U.S. inventories climbed by 4.5 million barrels to 533.6 million last week, outpacing analyst forecasts of 2.8 million.

Investors now want to see whether Wednesday’s figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration confirm the rise. EIA will release its report at 10:30 a.m. EDT (9:30 a.m. ET).

“With U.S. crude stocks continuing to mount into record territory both in total and at Cushing following almost two months of OPEC production restraint, we feel that the odds of a gradual unraveling in the OPEC agreement have been increased significantly,” Jim Ritterbusch, president of Chicago-based energy advisory firm Ritterbusch & Associates, said in a note.

Global benchmark Brent futures for May delivery were down 59 cents, or 1.1 per cent, at $50.37 a barrel by 9:48 a.m. ET. Earlier the contract fell as low as $50.05, its lowest since Nov. 30 when OPEC countries agreed to cut output.

On its first day as the front-month, U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures for May were down 53 cents, or 1.1 per cent, at $47.71 per barrel.

“A look below $50 (for Brent) is quite possible today if (EIA) data show a similar pattern, but it’s impossible to say how far below $50,” Commerzbank analyst Carsten Fritsch said.

A deal between the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and some non-OPEC producers to reduce output by 1.8 million barrels per day (bpd) in the first half of 2017 has had little impact on bulging global stockpiles of oil.

OPEC, which sources say is increasingly leaning toward extending cuts, has broadly delivered on pledged reductions so far, but non-OPEC states have yet to cut fully in line with commitments.

“OPEC has used up most of its arsenal of verbal weapons to support the market. One hundred per cent compliance by all is the only tool they have left and on that account they are struggling,” said Ole Hansen, head of commodity strategy at Saxo Bank.

U.S. shale oil producers have been adding rigs, pushing up the country’s weekly oil production to about 9.1 million bpd for the week ended March 10, up from an average of 8.9 million bpd for calendar 2016, according to U.S. energy data.

“OPEC’s market intervention has not yet resulted in significant visible inventory drawdowns, and the financial markets have lost patience,” U.S. bank Jefferies said in a note.

But the bank said the market was undersupplied and, if OPEC extended cuts into the second half, inventories would draw down and prices recover above $60 in the fourth quarter.

However, it said U.S. crude production was expected to grow by 360,000 bpd in 2017 and 1 million bpd in 2018, and a price recovery could spur more U.S. shale activity.

Source – read more

Clearly, we are not seeing an optimistic view for the brent crude oil. Further, downside risk for brent still prevails. How does this impact on Malaysia’s FBMKLCI stock index?

Generally, there is a positive correlation between FBMKLCI and Brent. Nevertheless, lately, we are seeing a “divergence” whereby FBMKLCI has been rising whilst brent has been declining.

B v K.png

Given the bearish prevailing sentiment for brent, is Malaysia’s FBMKLCI’s overstretched?

0200I.MY.jpeg

The following table shows the updated regression analysis between FBMKLCI and brent (since June 2014), whereby there is significant statistical relationship between FBMKLCI / brent:

Relationship_March 2017.png

Currently, the actual FBMKLCI exceeds its forecast value of 1,697 points but nevertheless it is within the 95%-confidence interval of between 1,601 – 1,792.

FKLCIvsBrent_Graph.png

Based on the regression relationships, the following table shows the possible forecast range of FBMKLCI based on the movements in brent crude (USD) (USD25 – USD62.50):

Forecast Range.png

DISCLAIMER: THIS IS A PERSONAL BLOG AND SHALL NOT BE RELIED IN WHATSOEVER MANNER BY ANYONE. ALL ARTICLES CONTAINED IN THIS SITE ARE FOR INFORMATION AND ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO SHOW ACTUAL RESULTS. IT IS NOT, AND SHOULD NOT BE REGARDED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE OR AS A RECOMMENDATION REGARDING ANY PARTICULAR SECURITY OR COURSE OF ACTION. SOURCES USED IN THIS SITE HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED FOR ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS AND TIMELINESS. YOU SHOULD SEEK INDEPENDENT AND PROFESSIONAL INVESTMENT ADVICE IN REGARD TO YOUR INVESTMENT DECISIONS. THE AUTHOR MAY HOLD POSITIONS IN THE SECURITIES MENTIONED IN THE ARTICLES.

The Condom Company

Listed Malaysian company, Karex Berhad is engaged in investment holding. The Company’s principal business activities include investment holding, manufacture and sale of condoms, latex probe covers, sterile catheters and other rubber products. The Company’s segments include condoms, catheters, and probe covers, lubricating jelly and others. The Company’s products include condoms, lubrication jelly, probe cover and foley balloon catheter. The lubrication jelly is greaseless, non-toxic and water soluble, and is suitable for gynecological use or when additional vaginal lubrication is needed. The probe cover product is specially designed for flexibility and safety during intracavity examinations with ultrasound. The foley balloon catheter product is specially designed for transurethral drainage of the urinary bladder, commonly used on patients anesthetized or sedated for surgery or other medical care. The Company operates in Malaysia, Thailand and the United States. At market close on 13 March 2017, Karex’s share price has fallen to a year low of RM1.98. Karex’s share price has been on a declining trend ever since the announcement of its latest quarterly result on 24 February 2017, in which there was a decline in q-o-q earnings. Continue reading “The Condom Company”